Site icon Bia review

3 trendy travel cameras

Rate this post

amazon 3 trendy travel cameras reviews

Canon Powershot G7 X, Fujifilm X-30, Sony RX100 Mark III, which test labs are in the premium segment for high image quality and outstanding technology features.

Design

At first glance, the Canon PowerShot G7 X looks pretty neat and luxurious with a black body made of alloy coated with white spots but also very dusty. The body is small in size but quite solid in the hand because it is relatively heavy compared to a compact (304 grams). The front of the camera is arranged by Canon with a control loop that can customize the shooting parameters and modes. Hand-held metal lenses on the lens provide a pleasing feel to the user, but EV compensation can sometimes cause unnecessary trouble. The touch screen has the ability to flip 180 degrees which makes it easy to take selfie shots. The touch screen is very responsive, useful in custom settings during video recording, but at the same time, the screen is scratchprone for long-term use, and also easy to stain if not protected.

The Fujifilm X-30 is a robust machine with a metal body but a bit rough. This is the heaviest product (384g) compared to the two competitors from Canon or Sony. But in return, the product delivers a firm feel when held in the palm of your hand. Like the Fujifilm X10 and Fujifilm X20, Fujifilm X30 has a metal on / off power system with zoom control or some of the new custom features built around the lens. This can bring a lot of interesting experiences to some people but it also brings a lot of nuisance because of the habit of change. Important innovations over the old generation X20 range focus on the camera’s customizable interface with new controls, viewfinder and high-resolution LCD. Adding a Wi-Fi connection makes the X30 more mobile-friendly, as well as the ability to share photos online. The Fujifilm X-30 is also equipped with an EVF 2.36-megapixel OLED viewfinder, twice the size of the Sony RX100 III.

In addition to the current 180-degree swivel LCD and the change of position of the flash to complement the EVF auto-focus viewfinder, the RX100 III has no change in layout compared to the previous generation. The new lens adds focal length and aperture to the zoom range (f / 2.8), making it different from other competitors in the segment. The machine still has a neat metal body design to pocket, but this also makes the small size controls difficult to customize. The front is quite smooth and no pads so during the course will be uncertain, users should use the strap to ensure the safety of the machine. To use the Wi-Fi feature with a smartphone, you need to download the Sony PlayMemories Mobile app for Android or iOS. This application allows remote control and image correction is quite good, but the connection speed is not high. Last but not least, the Sony RX100 Mark III is no longer being produced in Japan, which may cause some users to suffer a shortage but currently there is no change in product quality.

where can you get 3 trendy travel cameras online

Canon G7 X 9546B001 PowerShot Digital Camera: Buy it now

Fujifilm X30 12 MP Digital Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Black): Buy it now

Fujifilm X30 12 MP Digital Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Silver): Buy it now

Sony DSC-RX100M III Cyber-shot Digital Still Camera: Buy it now

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III rx100 III Mark 3 Digital Camera DSCRX100M3/B: Buy it now

Picture

The images captured on the Canon PowerShot G7 X give the colors a brilliance. Frames with high contrast, light spectrum have a clear division, the details in the light array is still stable. With RAW images, restoring the details is also easier. During the trial, the processing speed of the machine in complex lighting conditions was not good, especially in HDR (high dynamic range) processing. This is the weak point of the PowerShot G7 X compared to competitors such as Sony RX 100 III. The PowerShot G7 X’s ISO range is quite impressive with a sensitivity of up to 12,800 and the ability to handle noise and sharpness from RAW images is impressive. Quality image quality at ISO 1600, with higher levels, the image starts to decline in color as well as sharpness. At ISO 125, the Dynamic Range range is 12.4EV, and the PowerShot G7 X sensor works well at ISO 1600 with a range of 9.5EV, significantly reducing the maximum ISO at 12,800.

The Sony RX100 III offers the best detail of the three machines tested, while the Fujifilm X-30 has a slightly lower resolution than its competitors at 50m focal length. The Sony RX100 III produces good color images with stable saturation. The Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO) range is quite wide with automatic exposure, and users can use the additional exposure compensation when shooting in HDR mode. The lowest light noise from ISO 80-800, the image quality here is the best detail. At ISO 1600 the noise started to rise to ISO 6400, the image began to lose detail quite well. Auto white balance (AWB) for warm colors under the light yellow, while under the fluorescent light is relatively prominent red. In some default settings, the RX 100 III lacks a bit of contrast and saturation, however users can increase or decrease the customization to fit their preferences.

The Fujifilm X-30 stands out from the crowd in terms of color, daylight, and light spectrum. However, the efficiency of ISO noise is not high, the best range that Fujifilm has is ISO 400 back and then the image starts to appear many bright particles. However, in the ISO 100-400 range, the image quality of the Fujifilm X-30 is superior to the Canon’s RX100 III or G7 X. The Fujifilm X-30 Noise Reduction Algorithm can produce results in some cases, but it reduces the picture details considerably. The Fujifilm X-30’s DPO range has a range of 13.92EV, which is quite high at ISO 100 and down to 9.5EV at ISO 3200. The X-30’s D-Range automatic By exposure under high contrast conditions, but even off this mode, the detail in bright areas is still quite good.

Efficiency

Basically, the Canon PowerShot G7 X has wide-angle capabilities of the RX100 III and telephoto of the RX100 and RX100 II. Another difference is that the Canon G7 X has noticeably faster shutter speeds than its rivals from Sony, especially in subject matter locking. A highlight of the G7 X is a touch-enabled machine that allows users to focus more quickly and easily. Canon’s G7 X uses a 31-point autofocus autofocus system with the Auto Focus (AiAF) processor that enables fast processing with still or portrait shots, but in low light situations the speed Pretty slow at the telephoto frame. Those who are interested in close-up mode (Macro) at 5cm distance at the widest angle are not really impressed. At the maximum aperture of f / 1.8, the resulting image is not really sharp, but the depth of the image is quite good.

When comparing the RX100 III’s AF systems with previous RX models, the focus speed has improved but comes from the new lens system with a large aperture at some focal lengths, especially in Low light conditions. The lack of a touch screen in the high end segment makes the RX100 III lacks the flexibility, especially in selecting the focus point. For motion subjects, the Auto-Lock-on AF tracking feature will not work in low light conditions, or too strong, too small or too large. Regarding the metering system, the settings in the RX 100 III generally provide high accuracy regardless of lighting conditions. Macro photography can be performed at a distance of 5 cm from the subject’s body when shooting wide angle and 30 cm when using the tele. Sony claims the BIONZ X processor works three times faster than the older generation, but in fact it’s equipped with many new features like image stabilization and has made the speed do not improve.

The Fujifillm X-30 excels at single-AF focus speed and is well-suited for low-light situations. However, the X-30’s processing speed was not so good in using Live-View, especially when using zoom. The video was never Fujifilm’s power, but the X-30 changed the frame rate to 60 fps, and added an external microphone port.

Exit mobile version