amazon AMD Athlon X4 880K reviews
In addition to the new Wraith Cooler cooler, AMD also officially launched the new processor series. The most popular is the Athlon X4 845, which has a TDP of only 65W, and the mid-range AMD A10 graphics processor (APU), and especially the 8-core FX-8370 has just hit a new overclock record at 8,722.78 MHz, which is twice as high as the standard 4.300 MHz.
In this article, I will mention the Athlon X4 880K chip model designed towards the midrange configuration with relative performance that cost not too large. Can meet the different needs of home users and can even play current titles in full HD resolution; Of course in this case the graphics card will be the decisive factor.
Advantage
Good performance / heat dissipation, fan running smoothly when heavy loads Low power consumption.
Defect
Support old socket FM2 + so can not upgrade, later need to add discrete graphics card to use.
Technical features
The X4 880K is the first Kaveri-based design based on Steamroller architecture with 28nm (super-high performance) SHP technology, promising better performance and lower power consumption. Compared to previous generation chips.
In addition, the X4 880K is also the highest clocked chip in the Athlon X4 quad-core processor line, and comes with a new heatsink that delivers superior cooling performance and quieter operation. This is also AMD’s effort to help users save cost when building game configurations.
The difference with the A10 APU released at the same time is that the Athlon X4 880K does not have an integrated graphics processor (iGPU) so need to add separate graphics card as needed. This will help optimize the hardware configuration depending on the needs of each individual, gaming or needing more powerful graphics processing to run graphics, architectures or digital rendering applications.
Configure the test
For reference, I will test the Athlon X4 880K performance combined with discrete graphics HIS R7 360 iCooler OC (short for HIS R7 360, priced at about $120) on the motherboard Gigabyte G1.Sniper A88X. DDR3 RAM Mushkin Corsair Vengeance Pro kit 8GB 2.133 MHz bus, SS Corsair Force 240GB and Cooler Master Extreme Plus 550W.
In addition to the overall performance benchmarking tools PCMark 8 and 3DMark for graphics performance benchmarking, I also used a number of tests detailing the CPU and GPU’s own computing power and combat capabilities. “The game’s experimental configuration is at 720p and Full HD resolution. In the testing process, the system runs with the default setting and the results of the tests are recorded after three runs.
Also to mention the R7 360 iCooler OC, this is a midrange card model with a Radeon R7 360 graphics based design, Graphics Core Next (GCN) 1.1 architecture capable of multi-threading and better utilization. Graphics processing power with multiple pipelines at the same time and little effect on overall performance. True Audio audio technology and DirectX 12 graphics library available in Windows 10 bring gamers the same experience as the real environment.
In addition, the card was slightly overclocked when the GPU was running at 1,070 MHz, equipped with 2GB GDDR5 with 1,500 MHz clock, a bit higher than the 1400 MHz pulse of R7 370 but the communication set Remember only 128 bit limit.
where can you get a AMD Athlon X4 880K online
AMD Athlon X4 880K with 125W Thermal Solution 4.0 4 Socket FM2+ AD880KXBJCSBX: Buy it now
Performance evaluation
For example, the benchmark PCMark 8 benchmarked overall performance, the test configuration scored 3,652 on the Home test and 4,704 on the Creative test. With the 3DMark Cloud Gate, the system scored 27,226 Graphics, the CPU reached 3,159 points and the overall performance was 10,109 points.
Considering the CPU alone, the X4 880K is a bit higher than the same chip of the X4 860K that I had the opportunity to experience. Similar to Geekbench 3, the X4 880K also scored 2,545 points for single-core performance measurement and 7,710 multi-core performance points.
This is also normal as AMD’s new chips run at higher pulses and have better multi-threading capabilities. More specifically, the benchmark PCMark 05 benchmarks progress in parallel processing of compressed / extract data, encrypted / decoded data, compressed audio and compressed image files. The image is also higher from 2.9% to 7.9% than the X4 860K in the same test.
Specific, Alien vs. Predator achieve highest is 66.3 fps and down to 33.3 fps with very high graphics quality. Tomb Raider, a game developed in part based on AMD Gaming Evolved technology, also reached the highest level of 50.7 fps with High Graphics quality and 36.9 fps when pushing graphics to Ultra. Finally, Thief 4, a monument in the stealth action category of 34.7 fps with Normal graphics quality and reduced to 28.4 fps when set to the highest graphics level.
In idle mode, the X4 880K temperature oscillates at 32 degrees Celsius, the power consumption of the test configuration is about 64.3W (average). In 3DMark graphics tests, the Athlon X4 880K requires only 196.8W and the highest temperature of the chip is 75.3 degrees Celsius. This is due to the addition of a new cooler with high cooling performance and quiet operation.