Table of Contents
amazon Motorola BackFlip reviews
Design and Build Quality
Unconventional Form Factor
The Motorola Backflip was unlike any other smartphone on the market at the time. Its defining feature was its “backflip” mechanism—a hinged QWERTY keyboard that folded back against the rear of the device when not in use. When closed, the keyboard faced outward, exposing the keys. While this design choice raised eyebrows, it also allowed for a larger screen size relative to the overall footprint of the phone, as the keyboard did not have to slide out from beneath the display.
Build Quality and Materials
The Backflip had a solid build quality, with a combination of metal and high-quality plastic materials that gave it a sturdy feel. The hinge mechanism was robust, allowing for smooth transitions between the closed and open positions. However, the exposed keyboard on the back of the device was a potential point of concern for durability, as it was more susceptible to scratches and wear over time. Despite this, Motorola ensured that the keyboard was well-constructed, with keys that were tactile and responsive.
Keyboard and Touchpad
One of the most interesting aspects of the Backflip was the inclusion of a touchpad on the back of the display, just above the keyboard. This feature allowed users to navigate the phone’s interface without obstructing the screen with their fingers, similar to using a laptop’s touchpad. The touchpad was a unique and innovative addition, but its practicality was debatable. Some users found it to be a useful feature, especially when scrolling through long lists or webpages, while others found it to be an unnecessary complication.
The QWERTY keyboard itself was a standout feature. It offered a comfortable typing experience with well-spaced keys that had good travel. The keyboard’s design made it ideal for heavy texters or those who preferred physical keyboards over virtual ones. However, the exposed keyboard could lead to accidental key presses when the phone was in a pocket or bag.
Size and Ergonomics
The Motorola Backflip measured 108 x 53 x 15.3 mm and weighed 133 grams. These dimensions made it slightly bulkier than many of its contemporaries, especially when compared to touchscreen-only devices. The thickness of the phone, in particular, was noticeable, but it was a trade-off for the physical keyboard. Despite its size, the Backflip was comfortable to hold, and the hinge mechanism allowed for various usage modes, including a tent mode for watching videos.
Display
Screen Specifications
The Motorola Backflip featured a 3.1-inch TFT capacitive touchscreen with a resolution of 320 x 480 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of approximately 186 PPI. While this resolution was adequate for the time, it was not particularly high, especially compared to devices that were beginning to feature WVGA (480 x 800) displays.
Display Quality
The display quality on the Backflip was decent, with good color reproduction and brightness levels. However, the screen’s small size and lower resolution meant that text and images were not as sharp as on some competing devices. Viewing angles were also limited, which was a common issue with TFT displays. The screen was responsive to touch, and the capacitive technology ensured smooth operation, but the experience was not as immersive as on larger, higher-resolution displays.
Outdoor Visibility
Outdoor visibility was acceptable but not outstanding. The screen’s brightness could be adjusted to a sufficient level for use in direct sunlight, but glare and reflections were still an issue. The relatively small screen size also made it more challenging to use the phone effectively outdoors, as on-screen elements appeared smaller and harder to distinguish.
Performance
Hardware Specifications
The Motorola Backflip was powered by a 528 MHz Qualcomm MSM7201A processor, paired with 256 MB of RAM and 512 MB of internal storage. These specifications were modest even for 2010, as many smartphones were beginning to feature faster processors and more RAM. The Backflip’s hardware was sufficient for basic tasks and moderate multitasking, but it struggled with more demanding applications and games.
General Performance
In everyday use, the Motorola Backflip performed adequately for basic tasks such as texting, calling, and browsing the web. The user interface, powered by Motorola’s custom MOTOBLUR skin on top of Android 1.5 Cupcake (later upgradable to Android 2.1 Eclair), was generally smooth, but there were occasional slowdowns and stutters, especially when switching between apps or running multiple tasks simultaneously.
The 256 MB of RAM was a limiting factor, as it restricted the phone’s ability to handle multitasking efficiently. Apps would often close or reload when switching between them, leading to a less seamless user experience. The 528 MHz processor was also starting to show its age, as newer devices with faster processors were able to deliver snappier performance.
Gaming and Multimedia
The Backflip was not designed with gaming in mind, and its hardware reflected this. While it could handle basic games like Angry Birds or simple puzzle games, more graphically intensive titles were out of reach. The limited processing power and RAM made it difficult for the phone to run more demanding games smoothly.
For multimedia consumption, the Backflip was adequate but not exceptional. The small screen size and lower resolution made watching videos less enjoyable, especially compared to larger devices. The phone could play standard-definition videos without much issue, but high-definition content was a challenge. The speaker quality was average, providing clear sound at moderate volumes, but it lacked bass and could become tinny at higher volumes.
Software and User Interface
Android Operating System
The Motorola Backflip initially shipped with Android 1.5 Cupcake, which was one of the earlier versions of Android. It was later upgradable to Android 2.1 Eclair, which brought several improvements, including better performance, additional features, and a refreshed user interface. However, the Backflip did not receive updates beyond Android 2.1, leaving it behind as newer versions of Android were released.
MOTOBLUR Interface
Motorola’s MOTOBLUR interface was a custom skin that added several unique features to the Android experience. MOTOBLUR integrated social media updates, messages, and emails into a unified interface, making it easier for users to stay connected across different platforms. The interface also included customizable home screens with widgets that provided quick access to frequently used apps and information.
While MOTOBLUR had its advantages, it was not without its drawbacks. The additional features and visual elements added by MOTOBLUR could slow down the phone’s performance, particularly on hardware as modest as the Backflip’s. Additionally, some users found the interface to be overly complicated and less intuitive than the stock Android experience. The integration of social media updates directly onto the home screen was a novel idea, but it could become overwhelming for users who preferred a more minimalist approach.
Customization Options
The Motorola Backflip offered a decent level of customization, allowing users to personalize their home screens with widgets, shortcuts, and wallpapers. The MOTOBLUR interface also allowed users to resize widgets and rearrange icons to suit their preferences. However, the customization options were not as extensive as those offered by more recent versions of Android, and users were limited by the phone’s hardware capabilities.
App Ecosystem
The Backflip had access to the Android Market (now known as Google Play Store), which provided a growing selection of apps and games. However, due to the phone’s limited hardware and older version of Android, not all apps were compatible with the device. This limited the Backflip’s appeal to users who wanted access to the latest and greatest apps.
Camera
Camera Specifications
The Motorola Backflip featured a 5-megapixel rear camera with autofocus and an LED flash. At the time, a 5-megapixel camera was considered standard for mid-range smartphones, and the inclusion of autofocus and flash was a welcome addition.
Image Quality
The camera on the Backflip produced decent images in well-lit conditions, with good color reproduction and detail. However, the camera struggled in low-light situations, where images tended to be grainy and lacked detail. The LED flash helped in low-light scenarios, but it was not particularly powerful, and the results were often underwhelming.
The camera interface was straightforward, with basic settings for adjusting exposure, white balance, and scene modes. The autofocus was generally accurate, but it could be slow at times, leading to missed shots. The camera also lacked advanced features such as image stabilization or manual controls, which limited its versatility.
Video Recording
The Backflip was capable of recording video at 352 x 288 resolution, which was below the standard VGA resolution (640 x 480) found on many smartphones at the time. The video quality was passable for casual use but was not suitable for capturing high-quality footage. Videos recorded with the Backflip tended to be pixelated and lacked sharpness, especially in low-light conditions.
Battery Life
Battery Specifications
The Motorola Backflip was equipped with a 1400 mAh removable battery, which was standard for smartphones of its size and era. The removable battery allowed users to carry a spare battery or replace the battery if it degraded over time.
Battery Performance
Battery life on the Backflip was average, with the 1400 mAh battery providing enough power to get through a full day of moderate use. However, this was heavily dependent on how the phone was used. With light use—such as occasional texting, calling, and browsing—users could expect the battery to last until the end of the day. More intensive tasks like watching videos, using GPS, or playing games drained the battery more quickly, often requiring a recharge by mid-afternoon.
The phone’s battery performance was also affected by the MOTOBLUR interface, which constantly synced social media updates, emails, and other data in the background. While this feature was convenient, it also put additional strain on the battery. Users who wanted to extend their battery life could disable or reduce the frequency of these background syncs, but this came at the cost of losing the real-time updates that MOTOBLUR was designed to provide.
Charging and Battery Management
The Motorola Backflip charged via a standard micro-USB port, and the included charger could fully recharge the battery in about 2-3 hours. The device did not support fast charging, which was still a rare feature at the time, so users needed to plan their charging accordingly.
One advantage of the Backflip’s design was its removable battery, which allowed users to carry a spare battery for extended use without access to a charger. This was particularly useful for travelers or users who were frequently on the go. However, as with all batteries, the Backflip’s battery life would degrade over time, and heavy users might find themselves needing to replace the battery after a year or two.
Connectivity and Call Quality
Network Support
The Motorola Backflip was a quad-band GSM device, supporting 2G and 3G networks, with HSDPA speeds of up to 7.2 Mbps. This made it compatible with most carriers worldwide, though it was primarily marketed in North America. The phone’s network performance was typical for the era, providing reliable voice calls and decent data speeds for web browsing and app usage on 3G networks.
Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
The Backflip supported Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g, allowing users to connect to wireless networks for faster internet access and data usage without relying on cellular networks. Wi-Fi performance was generally good, with stable connections and reasonable speeds for browsing, streaming, and downloading apps.
Bluetooth 2.0 with A2DP was also included, allowing for wireless connections to Bluetooth headsets, speakers, and other accessories. The Bluetooth performance was adequate, with good range and stable connections, though it lacked the more advanced features and higher data transfer speeds of later Bluetooth versions.
GPS and Navigation
The Backflip came equipped with A-GPS, which provided location services for navigation and location-based apps. The GPS performance was accurate, and the device could quickly acquire a satellite lock when outdoors. Motorola included Google Maps as the default navigation app, which worked well for turn-by-turn directions and local searches. However, the small screen size and lower resolution made using the Backflip for navigation less ideal compared to larger devices.
Call Quality
Call quality on the Motorola Backflip was solid, with clear audio on both ends of the conversation. The phone’s earpiece provided adequate volume, and the noise-canceling microphone helped reduce background noise during calls. However, the speakerphone quality was only average, with some distortion at higher volumes. The placement of the speaker on the back of the device, adjacent to the keyboard, was also less than ideal, as the sound could be muffled when the phone was placed on a flat surface.
User Experience and Usability
Everyday Use
In day-to-day use, the Motorola Backflip offered a mixed experience. Its unique design and physical keyboard appealed to users who preferred a tactile typing experience, and the touchpad on the back of the screen provided an interesting alternative for navigation. However, the phone’s hardware limitations and older version of Android resulted in a user experience that felt sluggish and outdated, especially as newer, more powerful smartphones entered the market.
The Backflip’s smaller screen size also impacted its usability. While the compact form factor was convenient for portability, the screen’s limited real estate made it challenging to navigate complex apps or enjoy multimedia content. Additionally, the exposed keyboard on the back of the device was a double-edged sword—it was convenient for quick access, but it also made the phone feel bulkier and more prone to accidental key presses.
Target Audience
The Motorola Backflip was clearly aimed at users who valued physical keyboards and were heavily invested in social media. The MOTOBLUR interface was designed to provide a seamless social media experience, integrating updates from multiple platforms directly onto the home screen. This made the Backflip appealing to younger users who were active on Facebook, Twitter, and other social networks.
However, the phone’s appeal was somewhat limited by its modest hardware and aging software. As the Android ecosystem evolved, the Backflip’s inability to upgrade beyond Android 2.1 Eclair left it behind in terms of app compatibility and overall functionality. This made the device less attractive to tech-savvy users who wanted access to the latest features and apps.
Conclusion
Strengths
- Innovative Design: The Motorola Backflip’s unique backflip mechanism and touchpad set it apart from other smartphones of its time, offering a distinctive form factor that catered to users who valued physical keyboards.
- Good Build Quality: Despite its unconventional design, the Backflip was well-built, with sturdy materials and a robust hinge mechanism that ensured durability.
- Solid Keyboard: The full QWERTY keyboard provided a comfortable typing experience, making it ideal for users who preferred physical keys over virtual keyboards.
- Social Media Integration: Motorola’s MOTOBLUR interface offered strong social media integration, with real-time updates from multiple platforms directly on the home screen.
Weaknesses
- Outdated Hardware: The Backflip’s 528 MHz processor and 256 MB of RAM were underwhelming even by 2010 standards, resulting in sluggish performance and limited multitasking capabilities.
- Limited Software Support: Stuck on Android 2.1 Eclair, the Backflip missed out on many of the improvements and features introduced in later versions of Android, limiting its long-term appeal.
- Small Screen Size: The 3.1-inch display was small compared to competing devices, making it less ideal for multimedia consumption and web browsing.
- Exposed Keyboard: While innovative, the exposed keyboard on the back of the device was prone to wear and accidental key presses, and it added bulk to the phone’s design.
Final Verdict
The Motorola Backflip was a bold and innovative attempt to stand out in a crowded smartphone market. Its unique design, solid build quality, and strong social media integration made it an interesting option for users who valued physical keyboards and were active on social networks. However, the phone’s modest hardware, limited software support, and small screen size ultimately held it back from achieving widespread success.
For those who prioritized having a physical keyboard and a distinctive design, the Backflip offered a compelling alternative to the slate-style smartphones that were becoming increasingly popular. However, for users who wanted the latest apps, smooth performance, and a more modern user experience, the Backflip’s limitations were difficult to overlook.
In retrospect, the Motorola Backflip stands as an example of how innovation can both set a device apart and limit its appeal. While it may not have been a game-changer in the long run, the Backflip’s unique approach to smartphone design remains a noteworthy chapter in the history of mobile devices.
where can you get a Motorola BackFlip online
Motorola Backflip MB300 Unlocked Cellphone: Buy it now
Motorola MB300 BACKFLIP GSM Quadband Phone (Unlocked): Buy it now
