amazon Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 reviews
Specs
– Capacity: 64GB, 128GB, 256GB
– Size: 75 x 23.3 x 15.9 mm
– Weight: 17.7 grams
– Operating Temperature: 0 -> 60 ° C
– Storage Temperature: -20 -> 85 degrees C
– Speed USB 3.0: 225-135 MB / s (read-write)
– USB 2.0 interface speed: 30-30 MB / s (read-write)
– Warranty: 5 years
With 3 levels of very large capacity of 64GB, 128GB and even 256GB, can be found Kingston target those wishing to use the super speed USB as a regular data storage (in addition to running SSD laptop such small amounts). Not only that, I am thinking of a USB preloaded operating system, bringing work everywhere; or a specialized rescue equipment to help temporarily boot the system to look up instructions, download the necessary software to machine malfunction.
According to the data which it provides, DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 possesses read-write speed of up to 225-135 MB / s, faster than any public HDD and comparable midrange SSD products. Kingston’s recipe is stuffed to 8 parallel control channel pairs with high speed NAND, making this USB drive rather gigantic size compared to their peers.
DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 is quite modern forms and sturdy. Reviewing hand themselves over USB, I could not find a transplant joints at all. Relatively solid structure, whether compressed or twisted attempt to use force nor cause little deformation. The design ingenuity of Kingston shell made me pretty excited. The words “HyperX”, “Kingston”, and the traditional logo in full on the shell, just enough information just beautifully decorated.
DataTraveler HyperX USB 3.0 use. If the computer does not have this port, USB drive performance is reduced a lot, can only run at a speed of about 33 MB / s.
Placed side DT 101 G2 – a normal sized USB, DT HyperX and thicker to see clearly. DT HyperX size of 23.3 x 15.9 x 75 mm, weight 17.7 grams.
The calculation of the memory manufacturers are rounded: 1000 bytes = 1 KB; 1000 KB = 1 MB and 1000 MB = 1 GB (reality is 1024). Therefore, actual capacity is only 59.6 GB DataTraveler.
The test configuration – Test Content
Review article appeared in the to compare Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB – a standard USB 2.0 and SSDNow V + 200 90GB drives.
where can you get a Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 online
Kingston Digital HyperX 3.0 DataTraveler (DTHX30/128GB) by Kingston: Buy it now
Kingston Digital HyperX 3.0 DataTraveler (DTHX30/64GB): Buy it now
Test content includes:
– The hard disk benchmark software: Crystal DiskMark, ATTO Disk Benchmark, HD Tune Pro, HD Tach.
– Time machine to copy the data from the USB and USB to your computer: copy the folder 1.16 GB containing 290 JPEG files; copy mkv file 1.86 GB. For SSDNow V + 200, I make a copy of data within the drive.
Crystal DiskMark
Crystal DiskMark is a software I think the most reliable to evaluate speed data store.
Crystal DiskMark recorded a read speed of HyperX 3.0 is 242.3 MB / s and writes of 135 MB / s.
However, HyperX 3.0 is still not overcome the disadvantages of flash drives is speed access to a small capacity is still low. Therefore, in many cases still suffer less compared to the SSD.
ATTO Disk Benchmark
Software testing should compressed data on the SSD has a very high speed. Even DT 101 G2 also looked a bit with read-write speed increased to 34-24 MB / s. Particularly HyperX 3.0, the lag: the speed not lower than Crystal DiskMark but also unstable fluctuations.
HD Tune Pro
The software interface look super pro, like EEG. HD Tune Pro read speed record for HyperX 3.0, SSDNow V + 200 and DT 101 G2 respectively 210 MB / s, 362 MB / s and 31 MB / s.
Access time (access time, and directory) of the 3 is 0.792 ms, 0.05 ms and 0,957ms. Due in ms, so even slower HyperX SSD almost 20 times but never felt.
Time data replication
This is a comparison test of actual use. The content of this test is: copy 1.16 GB folder containing 290 JPEG files; copy 1.86 GB mkv file. For SSDNow V + 200, I make a copy of data within the drive.
In the content of this fact, the first HyperX, even far surpassed in time copying from the drive. Can explain my SSD units installed operating system, just to make the task has occupied data set OS (SSD speed is reduced through the number of times write / delete).
USB 2.0 slower than HyperX 3.0 from 8 to 30 times
