QNAP NAS TS-1685

amazon QNAP NAS TS-1685 reviews

QNAP TS-1685 is a 16-tray NAS with a rather unique configuration. The desktop-sized desktop enclosure features twelve 3,5″ trays designed for hard drives and four 2.5″ trays for SSDs. In addition, QNAP has added six M.2 trays inside, meaning that users can add up to six SATA SSDs if desired. The TS-1685 is equipped with an Intel Xeon D processor and supports up to 128GB of RAM. On the connectivity side, the NAS has four GbE ports and two integrated 10GbE ports. There are also three PCIe expansion slots that allow optional add-ons or add-ons such as multiple SSDs, graphics cards, sound cards, and the like. With all of this flexibility and loads of storage options, it’s hard to pinpoint exactly which segment is the sub-merger for the TS-1685. QNAP sees it as a great option for SMBs that need a combination of file sharing, storage virtualization, backup, and application hosting – basically making it a “jack-of-all-trades” for a growing small business or ROBO location.

The QNAP TS-1685 has enough room to fit between a small and medium enterprise. NAS has a lot of trays to add to the large capacity if needed, and if an extra device is added there can be a total of 56 trays. This NAS fits well with small businesses looking to grow and may need a lot of capacity and better network performance later, but not so much that they need to invest in larger rackmount devices.

The QNAP TS-1685 has a retail price of less than $ 3,000 for the bare NAS with 16GB of RAM. Our test products are configured with a 2.20GHz 6-core Intel D-1531 CPU and 4x16GB (64GB) RAM.

Specifications QNAP TS-1685

CPU: Intel Xeon processor

Maximum memory: DDR4 128GB (with DDR4 32GB RDIMM x 4)

Flash memory: 512MB DOM

Drive Cabinet:

HDD / SSD: 12 x 2.5 “/3.5″

Ổ SSD: 4 x 2.5 ”

Support hard drive: SATA 6Gb / s HDD and SSD

M.2 slot: 6 x M.2 2242/2260/2280/22110 SATA 6Gb / s SSD

Network: LAN: 2 x 10GBASE-T ports, 4 x Gigabit ports

USB: Front: 1 x USB 3.0. Back: 2 x USB 3.0

Audio: 1 x speaker, 1 x 3.5mm jack line-out

PCIe slots

Slot 1: PCIe x8 Gen.3

Slot 2: PCIe x4 Gen.2

Slot 3: PCIe x8 Gen.3

Source: 100-240V ~, 3-1.5A, 60-50Hz, 250W PSU

Power consumption:

Sleep mode: 61.36W

In operation: 127W

Fan: 3 x 9.2cm fan (12V DC)

Dimensions (HxWxD): 11.96 x 14.56 x 12.59 inches (303.84 x 369.89 x 319.8 mm)

Weight: 13.39 kg / 29.52 lb

Design and quality of machining

The TS-1685 is twice as high as most other NAS devices due to the numerous drive bays. There are two rows of trays along the front: eight 3.5 “trays on the bottom and four 2.5″ trays and four 3.5” trays on top for a total of sixteen trays. On the right hand side you will find the brand QNAP, a power button, and a USB 3.0 port QNAP places several additional drive bays on the inside, allowing users to easily access six slots M.2 to increase storage capacity.

On the back of the device, we see three large fans occupy most of the back. Nearly the bottom right is the power supply and its fan. On the left side are four network ports, two USB 3.0 ports and a slot for ventilation. There are three PCIe slots.

Manager

Like most QNAP product lines, the TS-1685 uses the QTS operating system. Some of the features in QTS make it attractive to a NAS that has a lot of storage space like this. Through Storage Manager, users can see which locations are mounted, as well as free space, LUN and partitions, drives. AppCenter allows users to download many other useful applications for businesses.

Analyze application load

The benchmark application load for the QNAP TS-1685 includes the MySQL OLTP performance over SysBench and Microsoft SQL Server OLTP performance with the TPC-C simulation load. In each scenario, the NAS takes advantage of two LUNs to serve from each of the two disk groups configured with eight SSDs per cluster. Four LUNs are used, balancing between two RAID groups. All tests are performed on dual 10GBASE-T connections that connect to four ESXi 6.5 hosts.

We have experimented with the RAID6 and RAID10 configurations in this review, focusing more on RAID10 providing higher performance. In all, we have sixteen Toshiba 960GB SSD HK3R2 drive, divided into two groups of 8 SSD.

Performance SQL Server

Each SQL Server VM is configured with two vDisks: a 100GB drive for startup and a 500GB drive for database and log files. From the point of view of system resources, we configured each virtual machine with 16 vCPUs, 64GB of DRAM memory, and used the SAS SCSI LSI Logic controller. While our previous Sysbench workload testing platform saturated both storage I / O and capacity, check out SQL evaluations for latency performance.

This test uses SQL Server 2014 running on Windows Server 2012 R2 guest VMs, and is highlighted by the Benchmark Quest Factory for the database. While our traditional use of this benchmark has been to test large-scale 3,000 databases on local storage or shared, in this iteration, we focus on the release of four engines The 1500 database is optimized on the QNAP TS-1685 (two virtual machines per cluster).

SQL server configuration check (per VM)

Windows Server 2012 R2

Storage capacity: 600GB is allocated, use 500GB

SQL Server 2014

Database

Dimensions: 1,500 scale

Number of virtual clients: 15,000

RAM pad: 48GB

Trial Time: 3 hours

2.5 hours running startup

Sample duration 30 minutes

SQL Server OLTP Factory Benchmark LoadGen

Dell PowerEdge R730 Virtualized SQL 4-node Cluster

Eight Intel E5-2690 v3 CPUs for 249GHz in cluster (Two per node, 2.6GHz, 12-cores, 30MB cache)

1TB of RAM (256GB per node, 16GB x 16 DDR4, 128GB per CPU)

4 x Emulex 16GB dual-port FC HBA

4 x Emulex 10GbE dual port NIC

VMware ESXi vSph ere 6.5 / Enterprise Plus 8-CPU

In our SQL Server test, we looked at the performance of the QNAP TS-1685. Here, NAS has recorded 11,999.5 TPS with individual virtual machines from 2,923.8 TPS to 3,104.6 TPS in RAID10 configuration. In RAID 6, QNAP devices hit 11,199.2 TPS with a VM range of 2, 755.9 TPS over 2,853.6 TPS.

When looking at average latency, the TS-1685 records a total of 261.5ms in RAID10 while pressing 617.5ms in RAID6. VM latency varies from 89.0ms to 389.0ms (RAID 10) and 515.0ms to 702.0ms (RAID6).

Performance Sysbench

Each Sysbench VM is configured with three vDisks: one for startup (~ 92GB), one with prebuilt database (~ 447GB), and third for databases that are tested (270GB). From a system resource point of view, we have configured each virtual machine with 16 vCPUs, 60GB of DRAM and use the SAS SCSI LSI Logic controller. Loaded gene system is Dell R730 to serve rs; We used a total of four servers.

Dell PowerEdge R730 Virtualized SQL 4-node Cluster

Eight Intel E5-2690 v3 CPUs for 249GHz in cluster (Two per node, 2.6GHz, 12-cores, 30MB cache)

1TB of RAM (256GB per node, 16GB x 16 DDR4, 128GB per CPU)

4 x Emulex 16GB dual-port FC HBA

4 x Emulex 10GbE dual port NIC

VMware ESXi vSph ere 6.5 / Enterprise Plus 8-CPU

Configure Sysbench Test (per VM)

CentOS 6.3 64-bit

Storage capacity: 1TB, use 800GB

Percona XtraDB 5.5.30-rel30.1

Database table: 100

Database size: 10,000,000

Database flow: 32

RAM Buffer: 24 GB

Trial Time: 3 hours

2 hours of running 32 threads

1 hour 32 threads

For Sysbench, we tested the QNAP TS-1685 using two virtual machines (8 and 4). With throughput, QNAP was able to reach 7281 TPS and 5208 TPS, respectively.

Looking at the average latency, the TS-1685 has 24.6ms with four virtual machines and 35.4ms with eight virtual machines.

In our largest delay benchmark scenario, the TS-1685 has an average latency of 169.4ms and 303.6ms.

Analyze VDBench Workload

When it comes to storage benchmarking, application testing is the best, and then the simulator test. Although not completely reflecting the work of the drive in practice, simulator tests help basic storage devices have a repeatable environment that makes it easy to compare between competing solutions. These downloads provide a variety of test formats, ranging from the “four corners” tests, common database size tests, as well as traces from other VDI environments. together. All these tests use the same vdBench generator, with a code snippet to automate and capture the results on a large test cluster. This allows us to repeat the same load on a variety of storage devices, including flash arrays and individual storage devices. On the device side, we use the Dell PowerEdge R730 server cluster:

where can you get a QNAP NAS TS-1685 online

Qnap TS-1685-D1521-32G-US High-Capacity: Buy it now

QNAP | TS-1685-D1531-32G-US | QNAP 12 (+4) Bay High-Capacity 10GbE iSCSI NAS, Intel Xeon D1531 6-core 2.2GHz, 32GB RAM, SATA6G, 4 x 1GbE, 2 x 10GbE (Base-T), 40GbE-ready (12TBx 12) Bundle.: Buy it now

Qnap TS-1685-D1531-64GR-550W-US 12 Bay High-Capacity power supply: Buy it now

Qnap TS-1685-D1531-128GR-550W-US Bay High-Capacity power supply: Buy it now

Experiments:

4k Random Reading: 100% Reading, 128 Posts, 0-120% iorate

Write 4k random: 100% Write, 64 threads, 0-120% iorate

64k sequential reads: 100% Read, 16 threads, 0-120% iorate

64k Sequential Write: 100% Write, 8 threads, 0-120% iorate

Consolidated Databases: SQL and Oracle

VDI Full Clone and VDI Linked Clone

Looking at peak read performance, the TS-1685 has impressive low latency in 4k read performance, measuring at 0.43ms from the start and under 1ms with 211,000 IOPS. Its highest latency is just over 13ms at 211,000 IOPS

The TS-1685 continues to achieve impressive performance when looking at 4k write performance. Here, the QNAP NAS starts with a 0.16ms lag and keeps under 1ms reaching 132,000 IOPS. At peak times, TS-1685 records over 134,000 IOPS at 10.3ms.

Switching to 64k maximum reading, the TS-1685 initially had a latency of 0.32ms and was under 1ms until it reached near 29,000 IOPS. It peaked at just over 34,100 IOPS with a 12ms latency. The TS-1685 ends the test with a bandwidth of 2.14GB / s.

Looking at 64k sequential recordings, the TS-1685 starts at 0.34ms and keeps under 1ms until it reaches just over 15,700 IOPS. The TS-1685 has a maximum latency of just over 16ms. The TS-1685 has a maximum bandwidth of 986MB / s.

Switching to our SQL Load, TS-1685 has started testing at 0.468ms and stayed below 1ms until only over 144,400 IOPS. It peaked at 180,000 IOPS and 4.3ms.

In standard 90-10, the TS-1685 has an initial latency of 0.458ms and is below 1ms until it reaches 888,425 IOPS. The TS-1685 peaked at just under 180,000 IOPS with 4.8ms latency.

The SQL 80-20 witnessed the TS-1685 starting with a 0.47ms latency and under 1ms until it moved over 6600 IOPS. The TS-1685 peaked at 158,000 IOPS with 5.33ms latency.

Switching to Oracle load, the TS-1685 starts with a latency of 0.52ms and stays below 1ms until it exceeds 45,000 IOPS. The A200 peaked at 142,000 IOPS with a latency of 7.9ms.

With the Oracle 90-10, the TS-1685 starts at a latency of 0.47ms and stays below 1ms until it reaches 103,000 IOPS. It reached a peak of 171,000 IOPS with a latency of 3.29ms.

Looking at Oracle 80-20, the TS-1685 starts at a latency of 0.468ms and stays below 1ms until it’s just under 65600 IOPS. It reaches 159,000 IOPS with a latency of 3.61ms.

Switching to VDI Full Clone, boot test shows that the TS-1685 has a boot delay of 0.4ms and is under 1ms until it exceeds 57K IOPS. The TS-1685 peaked at 138,934 IOPS with a 6.9ms latency.

The VDI Full Clone login initially started at 0.86ms, however, it quickly went through 1ms as it passed 4,000 IOPS. Peak performance is 42,627 IOPS at 19.9ms latency.

Second VDI Full Clone Log is the first non-millisecond performance, starting off 1ms on latency, 1.34ms. Peak performance is 49,982 IOPS at 10.16ms latency.

Switching to VDI Linked Clone, boot tests show performance below 1ms up to near 51K IOPS. The TS-1685 peaked at 81,438 IOPS at a latency of 5.6ms.

In the Linked Clone VDI measured the initial log performance, the latency started was just under 1ms at 0.97ms and 3,200 IOPS. It has a speed of 32,649 IOPS with a latency of 7.66ms.

In the VDI Linked Clone Monday Login there is no millisecond delay when it starts at 1.31ms with an IOPS of 3,294. It has a speed of 32,352 IOPS with a latency of 15.6ms.

Conclusion

The QNAP TS-1685 is a performance-enhancing NAS, with many features, and more connectivity than normal. NAS can hold up to 16 drives (12.5″ and 4″ 2.5″ or 16″ can be 2.5″ drives), which can help to maximize storage capacity in one size. But here QNAP outperformed by adding six M.2 trays on the inside, which is a bit hard to access, but potentially up to 6TB of high performance flash memory. From a performance point of view, NAS comes with Intel Xeon D processor and supports up to 128 GB of RAM.As for the network, the NAS has four GbE ports and two 10GBASE-T ports.If users need more storage or 40GbE, NAS has four PCIe slots for expansion.

Looking at the results, we run the standard work-flow analysis application, as well as the VDBench load analysis on the QNAP TS-1685. With our application load, we tested the NAS in RAID6 and RAID10 configurations. In our SQL Server benchmark, we saw the TS-1685 gaining a total of 11,999.5 TPS in RAID10 and 11,199.2 TPS in RAID6. With average latency, we saw a total score of 261.5ms in RAID10 and 617.5ms in RAID6. For our Sysbench test, we ran 4VM and 8VM in RAID10. Better performance was seen with 8VM, 7,281 TPS, 35,4ms average latency, and 303ms latency of the worst case. And with 4VM, we have reached 5208 TPS, average latency 24.6ms, and 169ms latency scenario worst.

Look at the VDBench tests, we see an impressive number of thousandths second of time waiting for the NAS desktop. In our 4k random standard, QNAP TS-1685 was able to hit 211K IOPS reads and 132K IOPS write before passing 1ms of latency. We found latency performance in milliseconds stronger in our 64k benchmarks, with NAS gaining 29K IOPS reads and 15.7K IOPS write before exceeding 1ms latency, with a corresponding bandwidth of 2.14GB / s and 986MB / s. We run three SQL load equal to 100% read, 90% read and 10% write, and 80% read and 20% write, with TSO-1685 hit 144K IOPS, 888K IOPS and 66K IOPS before touching 1ms latency. Running three similar tests with Oracle’s load, NAS reaches 45K IOPS, IOPS 103K, and IOPS 65K under 1ms latency. We also run the VDI Full Clone and VDI Linked Clone benchmarks for Startup Log, Initial Login and Login Monday. With Full Clone, the TS-1685 does not perform at exactly the right rate for several milliseconds of other tests, but still demonstrates robust performance for NAS with performance under milliseconds up to 57K IOPS and 4K IOPS on startup and first login. Similar link clone, no performance below milliseconds in Monday Sign but performance of 51K IOPS boot and 3200 initial IOPS log below 1ms latency.

Pros

Extremely flexible for both storage and connectivity

High performance reaches below milliseconds in VDBench, especially for a NAS like this

Attractive price

Cons

Redundant power supply will be a perfect complement

Epilogue

The QNAP TS-1685 offers SMB / ROBOs a highly customizable NAS, supporting up to sixteen drives in the front, and six through the M.2 slot inside. With the ability to further expand through PCIe (networking, audio, video), the TS-1685 can easily handle any role for multiple user needs.