The smartphone industry is marked by heavy competition. The leading brands in this industry with the highest market shares are Samsung, Apple, and Huawei. In recent years, the demand for smartphones has plateaued. Overall while adoption and use throughout the world have grown, smartphone demand fell in 2018 and 19 compared to previous years. To maintain their competitive position in the industry, smartphone companies are focusing heavily on research and development and marketing. Several forces affect the competitive function and success of smartphone companies. Porter’s five forces model is an analytical tool to analyze the competitive situation of businesses and the profitability of a particular industry. These five forces are a part of every industry. They also play a critical role in the smartphone industry and affect the profitability of individual brands. Following is a five forces analysis of the smartphone industry.
The bargaining power of suppliers in the smartphone industry is generally low except for a few large players like Google. Google is one of the largest suppliers in the smartphone industry. Most smartphones run on the Android operating system. Recently, the ban on Huawei related to the use of Android OS caused its sales to fall. Otherwise, most of the suppliers are smaller players, and most are located in the Asian region. Apple has its operating system, so in its case, the bargaining power of suppliers is even limited. Some of the main factors that determine the bargaining power of suppliers in the smartphone industry include their smaller size and lower financial strength compared to smartphone makers. Leading smartphone brands like Apple, Samsung and Huawei are comparatively larger firms with enormous financial strength than suppliers. It is why suppliers have to follow the quality standards set by the smartphone makers, and their bargaining power remains limited. Moreover, most suppliers lack forward integration capability, which also leads to lower control.
The bargaining power of buyers in the smartphone industry has increased owing to several factors. One of the primary reasons behind the growing bargaining strength of the customers is the high number of substitutes in the industry. Increasing competition in the industry has added to the bargaining strength of customers worldwide. Moreover, customers are well informed and have several choices before them. While the number of smartphone models has grown in the market, they are now more affordable than some years earlier. Companies invest aggressively in marketing and customer retention. Apart from that, they also invest aggressively in research and development to make their smartphone models stand out from the competition. The focus on customers and customer experience is much higher than ever before. Overall the bargaining power of customers is moderate. Some of the factors that control the bargaining power of the customers include product quality, brand image, and prices. Products with higher quality are higher in demand. For example, smartphones with higher processing power and efficient cameras are higher in order than other models.
The threat of substitutes in the smartphone industry mainly comes from rival brands and their products. There are several smartphone brands in the market. The top five brands with the largest market share include Samsung, Huawei, Apple, Xiaomi, and Oppo. Except, Apple’s iPhone rest of the smartphones run on the Android OS. The number of models with large screen smartphones is very high. While Apple makes only premium models, its products compete with the premium offerings from Samsung and Huawei, and Xiaomi. The threat of substitutes emerging from competing products also grows higher because differentiation has become difficult. Most models in a category come with similar features and nearly identical processing power. To overcome the threat from substitutes, brands invest in marketing and product innovation. Achieving differentiation is difficult, and so apart from technology, companies focus on their pricing strategies and customer experience. However, some factors that can moderate the threat from substitute products include product quality and brand image. The overall danger arising from substitute products is moderately high in the smartphone industry.
apple smartphone industry attractiveness of competitors in analysis are market share african a has intense pressures for cost reduction because consumers swot pest best buyer power booming brand loyalty background bargaining buyers suppliers barriers to entry bangladesh calculate the approximate two-firm concentration ratio competitive rivalry chinese challenges current trends case study nokia-microsoft alliance global advantage characteristics differentiation 2013 samsung’s dilemma pdf data drivers demographics slows down display definition exit economic factors affecting economies scale economics environmental smartphone-based 3d pipeline creative – replicate eu project new era competition and strategy future first mover india indian five forces forecast political overview google growth rate is complementor samsung growing game how been able sustain its sustainable huawei’s attractive should huawei evolving big much worth pollution mobile phone an oligopoly intensity life cycle introduction innovation iphone revolutionized intangible assets value capture chains japanese japan jobs key success white paper 2017 from kenyan e-commerce structuring internet os platform metrics korea legal 2019 leaders maturing be celebrated not lamented sri lanka stage latest news industry-leading size major players main companies leader structure malaysia entrants nokia was there why or net tracking rumbled now we must act opportunities threats operating system battle ecosystem overall anatomy pt mega pestle pestel product problems questionnaire regional manager vacancies revenue regulations repair reports 2018 research report strategic groups group map state statistics porter’s threat substitutes comparative sony xiaomi 4 0 5 app apps hotel hospitality what sources business kinds strategies did use become comes which camera impact patent wars on firm evidence gaming (circa 2011) pcs have lesson level manufacturing production payments profits philippines retail sales smartphones uk used us construction usage uae chain vietnam https // photographylife com/smartphone-vs-camera-industry wiki where technology banking australia china covid collusion crisis cagr description decline development essay facts figures globally headed virtual reality check as gets 5g samsung’s pakistan monopolistic outlook profile ppt profit capacity ranking review reddit supply statista saturated 2020 targeting youth timeline today wikipedia