Table of Contents
amazon ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT reviews
Asus TUF gaming RX 6800 XT: It must be said that 2021 is a successful year for AMD when it, in turn, gains advantages on both CPU and GPU “fronts” against two “blue team” competitors. Escaping from the extremely awkward position when only competing with competitors from the mid-range – high-end segment with the first generation of RDNA architecture.
In particular, when launching the AMD RX 6000 Series product line using the completely new RDNA 2 architecture. AMD boldly launched its “mainstream” product lineup, stretching from the most advanced segment AMD RX 6900 XT compete strongly with NVIDIA RTX 3090 graphics cards from the “blue team” to lower-range versions. Such as AMD RX 6800 to “compare” up and down with rival NVIDIA RTX 3070 in the mid-range – high-end segment.
Most especially, to “face” directly with NVIDIA’s “main” competitor in the high-end product segment that has been abandoned for many years. NVIDIA RTX 3080, AMD has been extremely “favorable” for a version of AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card that ASUS is one of the few companies that can “commit” in Vietnam with the ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT version. In contrast, many other competitors have to “sorry” to skip the product line. This product to come to the recently launched AMD RX 6700 XT because… out of stock.
Like some other manufacturers in recent times, they tend to use the same design framework to save manufacturing and manufacturing costs like Gigabyte used to do with its Gaming OC product line. ASUS also applies the same ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT in particular and TUF product line in general.
So at first glance, the graphics card model from the red team has an exterior similar to its “rival” ASUS TUF RTX 3080 Gaming OC 10G version. With only a slight difference that the box uses the dominant red tone instead of the banana green tones of graphics cards from NVIDIA.
Unboxing, it is easy to see that the design of both products is similar in both size and volume; both are graphics cards with the most “huge” size today, on par with the model. Gigabyte RTX 3080 Vision OC 10G and also very difficult to attach to Mid-Tower compact models like the FSP CMT340.
Still possessing a three-fan design with a mask made of metal, the ASUS TUF series graphics card model offers the luxurious, solid, and durable feel of a high-end graphics card product.
The small difference between the ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT and its rival from the blue team is that the ventilation “window” slot on the back is slightly smaller, which means that the PCB board of this version is longer than the RTX 3080 version.
That is similar to the recently launched Gigabyte RX 6700 XT Gaming OC 12G version, which also has a longer PCB board than the Gigabyte RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G version has a narrow backside heatsink.
That is why unlike the graphics cards using NVIDIA’s GPU chips that tend to put the power supply port near the middle, the ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT has an 8 + 8pin power supply configuration located near the bottom card body.
The writer himself prefers this type of power supply layout to the middle of the card body layout because this layout makes power cable routing simpler and easier. Not occupying the PCIe slot at the bottom, especially when you use another expansion device in this slot, such as a high-speed SSD, sound card, or professional capture card.
Another small difference lies on the back of the graphics processing chip when the version from the red team is equipped with MLCC (Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitor) “terrific” class with more capacitors than the version using the RTX 3080 chip.
Overall, as one of the “strategic” products of the ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT design team, it easily satisfies fastidious users with the “superior” of the heatsink, rigor in material selection, and sophistication in manufacturing.
Suppose the AMD RX 6800 graphics card model was introduced by Biareview to readers before. In that case, it can only be compared with the ASUS TUF RTX 3080 Gaming OC 10G only in the 3DMark Fire Strike test in traditional rendering, but The rest of the test is overwhelmed in many ways. Still, the results have become much more impressive for a more worthy competitor like ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT.
That is easily seen through preliminary tests using familiar scoring schemes.
For the traditional 3DMark Fire Strike rendering test, the product from the red team has far outstripped the opponent with a distance of 17.5%, a score of up to 50,147 points. Meanwhile, in the test Rendered with DirectX12 3D Mark Time Spy, both versions of the graphics card showed similar scores with approximately 17,900 points.
where can you get a ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT online
ASUS TUF Gaming AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 4.0, 16GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, Dual Ball Fan Bearings, All-Aluminum Shroud, Reinforced Frame, GPU Tweak II): Buy it now
That shows that with games rendering using traditional methods, AMD’s representative product will achieve outstanding speeds compared to the competition, and both will be “equal” on games rendered with DirectX12.
However, in the 3D Mark Port Royal rendering test of Ray Tracing technology, the ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT still lags behind the competition when it only reaches 8,871 points, despite surpassing even the “biggest” graphics card of the company. Previous Turing generation like NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti, but compared to the direct competitor in this generation of RTX 30 Series, the graphics card model from AMD is still certain to be inferior.
Of course, for actual game tests, this depends on the hardware optimization capabilities of each game studio to be able to fully exploit the powers of the RDNA 2 architecture.
Overall, ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT is a powerful card model, capable of conquering most games on the market at the highest setting and 1080p resolution at over 100fps.
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is still a “fierce land” for the “red team” graphics cards when it requires more power from the CPU, so when testing with the same Intel Core i7 8700 processor model, the game stuck a heavy bottleneck. You’ll need “heavy” processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900x to get the most out of this heavy-duty graphics card.
Games developed with the support of engineers from AMD, such as DIRT 5 or God Fall, all show the advantage of AMD RX 6800 XT because the graphics engineers have promoted this graphics card model better than the rival version.
The long-time PS4 exclusive game Horizon Zero Dawn has a pretty good performance when the GPU FPS level is up to 163fps, far beyond the level that the CPU can “load,” creating an extremely serious bottleneck title for this game.
The power of ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT is completely enough for gamers to try out these titles at 4K (2160p) resolution, thereby also reducing bottlenecks caused by GPUs working too fast without causing any problems CPU can’t keep up.
In general, the new graphics card model has given AMD the ability to compete “fairly” with rivals from NVIDIA, both in terms of power and the scope of “battlefield” when both can help users experience the game in 4K resolution.
It must be said that many recent models of graphics cards using AMD’s GPU chips have a hotter maximum temperature than many products from the “blue team.”
Most recently, the AMD RX 6700 XT has a “jumping” temperature of up to 97 degrees when tested with the famous “card-consuming” Fur mark program.
Although equipped with a “terrific” heatsink, ASUS TUF GAMING RX 6800 XT still operates quite hot with a maximum temperature of up to 96 degrees.
This heat level has not yet reached AMD’s warning “threshold.” Still, compared to the “cool” figure of only 72 degrees Celsius of the ASUS TUF RTX 3080 Gaming OC 10G version, you will feel a little uncomfortable if you are interested in this issue.
The consolation is that the operation of the graphics card model is still extremely smooth, without experiencing any overclocking caused by overheating like the previous SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5600 XT 6G version. Mainly, ASUS engineers designed a heatsink system with good coverage, cooling both the power supply phases and the graphics RAM simultaneously.