Thermaltake DuOrb vs Gelid Icy Vision – Detailed Comparison

Rate this post

1. Design and Cooling Approach

Feature Thermaltake DuOrb

Gelid Icy Vision

Cooling Design Distinctive dual-orb heatsink layout with two circular heatsinks and fans Conventional GPU cooler with large fin stack and dual fans
Fan Configuration Dual 80 mm fans Dual 92 mm fans
Heatpipes 2 copper heatpipes 5 copper heatpipes
Heatsink Material Copper base with copper fins Copper base with aluminum fin stack
Cooling Surface Smaller, orb-style heatsink design Large heatsink with 85 aluminum fins
Additional Cooling Small VRAM heatsinks included Dedicated RAM and VRM heatsinks
Dimensions 180.5 × 98.5 × 30 mm 216 × 95 × 52 mm
Weight Around 324 g Larger and heavier due to bigger heatsink
Airflow / Noise Rating Not specified Around 67 CFM airflow and ~26 dBA noise level
Design Focus Compact size and airflow across the whole GPU Maximum cooling capacity with modern heatsink design

2. Cooling Performance

Aspect Thermaltake DuOrb Gelid Icy Vision
General Performance Better than most stock coolers of its era Generally stronger cooling performance
Example Test Around 75°C under load on an ATI X1950XTX Around 21°C improvement over reference cooler on GTX 480 (overclocked)
Heat Dissipation Limited by two heatpipes Greater thermal capacity due to five heatpipes and larger heatsink
Handling High-TDP GPUs Suitable for older GPUs with moderate heat output More effective for hotter GPUs and overclocking

3. Noise Levels

Aspect Thermaltake DuOrb

Gelid Icy Vision

Fan Size 80 mm 92 mm
Fan Speed Up to ~2500 RPM Lower RPM due to larger fans
Noise Behavior Can become noticeably loud at full speed Generally quieter than stock GPU coolers
Fan Control Often requires fan controller for quieter operation Early versions lacked PWM, so manual control may be needed

4. Size and Compatibility

Aspect Thermaltake DuOrb

Gelid Icy Vision

Physical Size Compact cooler Significantly larger
Expansion Slots Used Usually 1 additional slot Often 2–3 slots
Case Compatibility Works well in smaller cases Requires more internal space
Multi-GPU Setup Better suited for SLI/CrossFire systems Large size may limit multi-GPU compatibility
Cooling Potential Lower due to compact design Higher thanks to large heatsink and heatpipe count

5. Installation and Usability

Aspect

Thermaltake DuOrb

Gelid Icy Vision

Installation Difficulty Relatively simple installation Installation takes longer
Mounting Hardware Some users reported fragile mounting hardware More robust mounting system
Additional Components Basic VRAM heatsinks Includes many small heatsinks for RAM and VRM
Installation Time Faster Longer due to more components

6. Pros and Cons

Category

Thermaltake DuOrb

Gelid Icy Vision

Pros Unique dual-orb design
Compact size
Good cooling for older GPUs
Uses minimal expansion space
Strong cooling performance
Five heatpipes and large heatsink
Quiet dual 92 mm fans
Includes RAM and VRM heatsinks
Cons Limited cooling capacity
Fans can be noisy at full speed
Basic VRAM cooling
Large size (often 3-slot setup)
Early versions lacked PWM fan control
Installation takes longer

7. Final Verdict

Category

Better Option

Explanation

Cooling Performance Gelid Icy Vision Larger heatsink and five heatpipes provide significantly better thermal capacity.
Noise Levels Gelid Icy Vision Larger fans move more air at lower RPMs.
Compact Size Thermaltake DuOrb Smaller footprint and minimal slot usage.
Multi-GPU Compatibility Thermaltake DuOrb Easier to install in SLI/CrossFire setups.
Overall Capability Gelid Icy Vision More modern cooling design with superior thermal performance.

Conclusion

The Thermaltake DuOrb advanced cooling technology through its compact design and unique visual design which delivered superior temperature control compared to standard GPU coolers of that period.

The Gelid Icy Vision, however, represents a more advanced approach to GPU cooling, using more heatpipes, a larger heatsink, and bigger fans to achieve better thermal performance and quieter operation.

The Icy Vision serves as the better choice for users who need extreme cooling performance while the DuOrb maintains its significance through its small size and distinctive dual-orb design.

Leave a Comment