amazon Intel Core i3 8100 reviews
It can be said that Coffee Lake is a platform that brings many architectural improvements on Intel’s CPUs since the breakthroughs from Lynnfield and Sandy Bridge in the past, with all CPUs being upgraded. Significantly in the number of cores and threads. Typically, the i7-8700K, i5-8600K / 8400 have quite good performance and price compared to AMD’s competitors Ryzen 7 1800X / 1700, Ryzen 5 1600X / 1500X / 1400, meanwhile In the mass segment, Intel takes the i3 8100 core to compete directly with AMD’s Ryzen 3.
Will Core i3-8100 help Intel regain its mass-market segment that has recently lost its upper hand by AMD? This article will generally evaluate the performance of the Core i3-8100 to help you get a more accurate answer.
In this article, the systems used to compare the performance between Core i3 8100 and the popular segment CPUs include:
Intel Socket 1151 (Z370)
– Intel Core i5-8400, i3-8350K
– 4x 8GB G.Skill RipJaws V DDR4-3200 at 2400, 2666, 2933, and 3200Mhz
AMD Socket AM4 Workstation
– AMD Ryzen 5 1500X, Ryzen 5 1400, Ryzen 3 1300X, Ryzen 3 1200
– MSI X370 Xpower Gaming Titanium
– 2x 8GB G.Skill RipJaws V DDR4-3200 at 2667 and 3200Mhz
Intel LGA 1151 (Z270)
– Intel Core i3-7350K, i3-7100 and i5-7400
– MSI Z270 Gaming 7
– 2x 8GB G.Skill RipJaws V DDR4-3200 at 2666 and 3200Mhz
Along with the GTX 1080 video card, Windows 10 operating system with the latest updates and drivers and all games are set to the highest setting on 1080p resolution.
The first is with 3DMark, dedicated software to test the processing ability of the hardware in theory, here can see Physics score on Dx11 of Core i3-8100 reaching 7993, ~ 8% higher than with even the i5-7400 at 7358, while when compared to AMD’s Ryzen, the Core i3 8100 has a similar score to the Ryzen 3 1300X and ~ 14.4% higher than the Ryzen 3 1200. Contrast On the Dx11, the Dx12 i3 8100 scores ~ 5% better than the Ryzen 5 1400 and a pretty big difference compared to the i3-7100 with a score difference of ~ 48%.
Ashes of the Singularity (AotS)
For CPU-close games like Ashes of the Singularity (AOTS) with the ability to take advantage of very good processing threads, the possession of more processor cores helps the Core i3 8100’s performance reach 28.2FPS on par with Ryzen 5 1400, which is ~ 2FPS better than i5-7400, is ~ 21% better than Ryzen 3 1300X and ~ 26.6% better than i3-7100. Meanwhile, lower than i5-8400 ~ 22%, it is not surprising that Core i3-8100 only has 4 processing cores.
Meanwhile, in Civilization VI, the Core i3 8100 has a performance of 64.4FPS, ~ 10% higher than the i5-7400 (58.3FPS), while compared to Ryzen, even Ryzen 3. The 1500X is also ~ 4.6% less efficient than the i3 8100, and even the Ryzen 5 1400 has to be overclocked to 3.9GHz to match the i3 8100.
Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War III
Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War III is considered one of the games capable of taking advantage of the hardware quite well, but is quite sensitive to the operating clock. Typically, we can see a clear difference between the Core i3 8100 at 86.3FPS and the i3 8350K of 97.6FPS, while the i3 8100 continues to outpace Intel’s previous generation CPUs of i5 7400, i3 7100. and rivals Ryzen 5 1400, Ryzen 1300X / 1200.
Grand Theft Auto V
Next in the GTA V game, the Core i3 8100’s performance is ~ 18% lower than the i5-8400 and ~ 6% lower than the i3 8350K (default pulse), while for the i5-7400, the i3 8100 is still with ~ 13% higher performance and ~ 36% performance difference compared to the i3 7100. AMD Ryzen CPUs are not as favored by the GTA V title as Intel CPUs when even Ryzen 5 1500X is overclocked to 3.9GHz but still has ~ 12% lower performance when compared to the Core i3 8100.
Hit man (2016)
Similar to the Hit man game (2016), the performance of the Core i3 8100 is not much worse than the i3 8350K (in the default state), but when compared to the i5-8400, the difference is extremely large differences in the number of personnel handled. The difference for the Kaby Lake CPUs is also quite clear when the i3 8100 is ~ 7.5% better than the i5 7400, and for Ryzen, even the Ryzen 5 1500X when overclocked to 3, The new 9GHz renders more effects than the i3 8100 3FPS.
Something quite simple on the Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor game, when the top effect belongs to the i3 7350K, even the Core i3 8100 and i3 8350K also give better performance with the i5-8400, showing the title. Shadow of Mordor game relies on quite a lot of CPU’s single-core processing and clocking capabilities, but the Core i3 8100 still has better performance with the i3 7100 despite having a lower clock rate. It was followed by the Ryzen CPU with the results that did not deviate too much from Intel’s CPU, with the Ryzen 3 1200 having the lowest performance, however all-day, the frame rate this CPU still hit at 124FPS.
Far Cry Primal
Like Shadow of Mordor, Far Cry Primal is also a fairly responsive game to the CPU clock speed when it shows that the i3 8350K’s performance with the i5 8400 is equal, followed by the i3 8100 with The difference is about ~ 6%, while even the Ryzen 5 1500X, when overclocked up to 3.9GHz, is struggling to beat the i3 8100. Similar to the Skylake, the i3 8100 still has a gap. Clearly compared with the i3 7100, even with the i5 7400.
Rise of the Tomb Raider can be said to be one of the titles that favor Ryzen CPUs, helping to shorten the gap between Intel and AMD. However, the Core i3 8100 once again affirms its position in the segment with the performance consistently outperforming the Ryzen CPUs, although even with the Ryzen 5 1400’s performance at the bottom of the table, frame rates still achieved at 118FPS.
Thus, through a series of tests, it can be seen that the results are quite decisive when the i3-8100 continuously wins over the Ryzen 3 CPU series, even Ryzen 5 in the gaming. As for Kaby Lake, the Core i3 8100 also brings obvious improvements over its elder generation, the i3 7100, even with the i5-7400, all thanks to the 14nm architecture improvement with the addition of processor cores on Intel’s Coffee Lake platform. However, if you have the need to use applications, multitasking requires high capabilities from processor threads, then Ryzen 5 is still an option with a pretty good price at the moment with the ability to play a good game.
It’s really hard to think of the downsides of the i3 8100 core, the only thing that can be considered the downside here is that this CPU doesn’t support Intel’s Turbo boost feature so the clock speed will always be is locked at 3.6Ghz default. Also, if you want to find an overclockable CPU from Intel for a fairly soft price, perhaps the i3 8350K would be a more affordable option with a pretty good overclocking capability. But if you are simply an ordinary user, looking for a CPU with good general performance and a low price, the i3 8100 is sure to be the first choice in this segment.
Hopefully, this article will help you have a more intuitive view of the i3 8100’s performance as well as the choice of a CPU like that becomes easier.
where can you get a Intel Core i3 8100 online
Intel Core i3-8100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 3.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W: Buy it now
Intel Core i3-8100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 3.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W (Renewed): Buy it now
Intel OEM Core i3 i3-8100 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.60 GHz Processor: Buy it now