amazon King Arthur: Legend of the Sword reviews
Legend of the Sword is the latest production by director Guy Richie, a director he likes very much through The Man from U.N.C.L.E and Snatch. Actually I watched this movie without knowing Guy Riche directed, but just a little bit to see right away. In addition, I’m a fan of the movie King Arthur released in 2004 by Clive Owen, Keira Knightley should also expect this version of 2017 for comparison.
The first comparison of the two films is that these two texts … are not related to each other from style, content to storytelling. There is also a circus knight, there are also Arthur, there are Vikings, … but the 2004 version is epic style, heroic, honoring the knight and teammates, the 2017 style is complete. Other, comedy is not necessarily comedy, epic is not necessarily epic, it is very strange expression, interesting but there are many places it ruined all the emotions.
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword as its name mainly refers to King Arthur and the “sword in stone” legends Excalibur. The timeline of the 2017 may be before the 2004 edition, so this time King Arthur is a bit “wild”. Arthur (Charlie Hunnam) witnessed the death of his father (King Uther – Eric Bana) when his brother Vortigern (Jude Law) countered. He “drifted off” to a new land, was raised by brothel girls, grew up with a filter of flybynight learning due to circumstances and also learned martial arts.
where can you get a King Arthur: Legend of the Sword online
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword: Buy it now
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2016) (BD) [Blu-ray]: Buy it now
Guy Ritchie led quite fast, film circuit “rushing” from the beginning of the film but you rest assured that many knots will be gradually removed to the end of the film, quite complete. This is a fairly intelligent and creative way of doing it, but how do you find it suited to the type of spy film, like The Man from U.N.C.L.E, but this one seems to make the viewer confused. Accompanying that is the style that shows off the elegant character, the rooster that Guy Ritchie or make the most out of his films is also in King Arthur. I am not very clear about the costumes of this time, maybe this detail is wrong, but when King Vortigern reigns, he dressed in a new style of clothing today, so this makes me refer to the doctor. Watson (also played by Jude Law) in the Sherlock Holmes film series (also directed by Guy Ritchie) finds the time machine back in time as King Vortigern. Guy Ritchie’s new way of acting is counterproductive, the epic epic of the movie is almost nonexistent, the climax is like the death of a teammate does not leave any emotion. It kept drifting so fast, and it was like joking.
One thing that must be praised is that King Arthur: The Legend of the Sword is spinning so well, from the image to the sound, the full effects, the witch element to The Mage character (Astrid Berges-Frisbey) Help the movie show off skill. However, as mentioned above, the style of Guy Ritchie does not seem to fit King Arthur.
Plot Summary
Darkness and turmoil reigned over Britain. The reigning king, Uther Pendragon (Eric Bana), has a tyrannical sorcerer, Mordred, threatening his rule. A fierce battle ends in betrayal when Uther’s brother, Vortigern (Jude Law), murders him and seizes the throne. His infant son Arthur, to escape Vortigern’s wrath, is sent away and finally grows up as a street child in London, unaware of his royalty.
Arthur lives among the bustling yet dangerous streets, fighting for survival and trying to carve out a name for himself. When the mystical sword Excalibur appears in the stone, there is a prophecy signifying a threat to the rule of Vortigern. Arthur is sucked into the fold of magic, fate, and political intentions as he discovers his true bloodline and fights alongside the battle to take back his birthright.
Character Analysis
Charlie Hunnam plays a very different Arthur, not the traditional portrayal of the character. Bringing an edge of grittiness and streetwise appeal to Arthur, Hunnam reflects a person molded out of the harshness of upbringing and survival instincts. His performance mirrors the evolution of Arthur from being a reluctant hero to a positive character who believes in his ranging abilities, although some viewers might justifiably see this as a modern and slightly rebel-influenced approach to the character, quite in contrast to the traditional themes of Arthurian.
Vortigern (Jude Law): Jude Law’s Vortigern is not the typical antagonist. His motivations are construed out of ambition and the thirst for power-fueled material. Law, in turn, brings his own menacing charisma to the judgment role-king, made a fearsome enemy by the tyranny and ruthlessness he exudes. Backstory, as well as a possible motivation, brings his junction to give him that multi-dimensional character arc essential to the depth of his villainy.
Morgana (of Astrid Bergès-Frisbey): Astrid Bergès-Frisbey, in actual fact, plays Morgana, the woman, a formidable sorceress, and she adds this ambiguous quality and mysterious role. The character is directly related to some magical force within the plot; however, her ends are somehow uncertain, as is her motivation. Bergès-Frisbey serves an ethereal, mysterious, and “aura-conducive” step of performance
Uther Pendragon (Eric Bana): A short role with maximum implication is brought to life by Eric Bana as Uther Pendragon. The character sets up most of the action for the rest of the film, while Bana manages to convey the weight of a king betrayed, the gravitas of fatherly love for a son. Although he does not spend much time on the screen, he presents an important part in establishing the film’s emotional core.
Bedivere (Djimon Hounsou): Djimon Hounsou’s Bedivere is a loyal mentor of arc to Arthur. Hounsou gives to the character the flavor of wisdom and strength, becoming a guide, protec- tor. He is a very critical facet in setting up Arthur’s understanding of his destiny and the obstacles in the path ahead.
Destiny and Legacy: The theme of destiny and legacy is central to “King Arthur: Legend of the Sword.” Arthur’s elevation from a street thief to the king of Britain emphasizes the premise that a destined leader emerges from the lowly. The film considers how legacy influences identity and the ensuing responsibilities such a legacy embodies.
Power and Corruption: The staging of the film exposes power’s corrupting tendency shown through the character Vortigern. His avaricious pursuit of control and what he will do to maintain his throne beautifully portray the unbridled ambition and the moral costs attached to power.
Magic and Myth: The magical elements of the plot—the sword Excalibur and the mystical realm—are the subject of examination. The film is a historical drama with fantasy elements, looking at how the world of myth and magic intertwines with humanity’s struggles for dominance and identity.
Identity and Self-Discovery: Along the way, Arthur’s becoming is an act of self-discovery. With his royal legacy being disclosed to him, he contends with his identity and the implications that come with his acceptance of his destiny. The development of the man’s inner conflict toward acceptance of that role as a leader is portrayed in the film.
Visual and Special Effects
One of the striking features of “King Arthur: Legend of the Sword” is its visual splendor and special effects dynamism. Guy Ritchie charged this film with a frenzied dynamic, a distinctive interpretation of action and visual storytelling. CGI was utilized in creating some fantastic battles, magical landscapes, and otherworldly influences even though several critiques of the film maintain that such extensive digital use serves at times to mock the authenticity of the historical background.
More particularly, the sword Excalibur is highlighted in the visual design of the film. The transformation of the sword and scenes demonstrating its magical characteristics are rendered with stunning detail, which augments the sense of grandeur and the mythical quality of the film.
Direction and Screenplay
Guy Ritchie gives a unique stylistic whirl through his take on the Arthurian legend, deploying his trademark collage of rapid cuts, spontaneous action sequences, and edgy banter. The film clip is fast, emphasizing adrenaline-rushing segments and visual spectacles. Ritchie’s inclusion of the contemporary into the tale does not necessarily sit well with all viewers, particularly those looking for some old-fashioned rendition of the Arthurian legend.
The screenplay, co-authored by Ritchie, Joby Harold, and Lionel Wigram, tries to forge a balance between historical drama and fantasy. Most times witty and engaging, the dialogues often lose hold of the plot, quite disjointed. A few characters and subplots are poorly developed, and the film dips into erratic territory in its attempt to merge different genres and tones.
Criticisms
Pacing and Plot Structure: One of the primary complaints against “King Arthur: Legend of the Sword” is its pacing and arrangement in the script. The film passes quickly from one action scene to the next and to new developments in the plot, giving a slightly disjointed feeling to some viewers. This movement might feel a bit too fast at times for some viewers, especially in the build-up to major events, with regard to how the story has progressed.
Character Development: The film does boast an excellent ensemble cast but fails to create depth and development for some characters. For instance, Morgana’s motivations and place in the whole story facet are not fully fleshed out as certain supporting characters are assigned little space on the screen. This, in turn, can lead to a lack of emotional investment by viewers in the characters and their arcs.
Historical Accuracy: This movie showcases that the whole rumor that it mangles the Arthurian legend and much more history is true. This would be expected of any fantasy reimaginings, but some have described disappointment in seeing Arthur and his worlds drift away from everything they had been taught. The blend of new and medieval elements may not sit well with many purists who consider this less faithful adaptation.
Visual Over-Indulgence: High dependency on CGI and other visual effects has been disapproved of as masking any narrative or character development. Though the visual spectacle is worth the watch, it is claimed to not have earned the right to it.
Conclusion
“King Arthur: Legend of the Sword” has boldly and ambitiously retold the Arthurian legend, though fresh interpretations almost always draws criticism from keepers of the original versions. Guy Ritchie’s directorial style along with that shown in the movie has rendered the viewing a very energetic and eye-grabbing experience, but where this film has been disputed before is in its pacing, structure of the plot, and development of the characters.
The film is a completely entertaining unorthodox presentation of the Arthurian legend through elements of historical drama and fantasy. It may certainly fail to satiate everyone, especially those having a penchant for conventional or serious history in their Arthurian storytelling; but for them, this is a totally new, contemporary interpretation of the timeless tale.
In conclusion, “King Arthur: Legend of the Sword” stands as a bold effort in shaking a very classic legend up but makes it worth its efforts by reviving it for the next generation. Its visual magnificence and dynamic direction make it so much fascinating that it doesn’t become too much of a stretch for audiences wondering at its narrative and character development.